DECEMBER 2005

  JUDGE MEINERZHAGEN

AT THE TRIAL OF A MAN CALLED ZUNDEL

In the first session of the morning, it seems one of Zündel's lawyers was dismissed by the judge for some reason that remains a mystery to me.Though perhaps others you will be in contact with will know the reasons. This young woman is apparently an assistant to Mr. Horst Mahler. She was very impressive as a defending lawyer and, in spite of her youth, demonstrates a level of maturity not usual in people of her age.     In any event, in response to this the Zündel team essentially charged the judge saying that he must decide if he is fit to hear the trial as he seemed to express a bias against the defendant! After a brief recess, the judge finally decided to hold over a decision on this matter until next Tuesday the 15th of November.  It is bizarre to me to see a judge having the right to decide whether he has a bias or not , but that is the situation.

  ZUNDEL, AN ARTIST ON TRIAL FOR DEFAMING THE "HISTORY OF THE JEWS"

Incidentally, whilst the members of Zündel's team were making their submissions, the judge looked as though he was asleep. His head was down and his eyes were closed. I know this sounds funny, but I am not joking. It is the absolute truth. The judge was either actually asleep or was making a very overt demonstration of his indifference to the submissions - this was the worrying part of the proceedings. At one point one of Ernst's supporters made a sudden loud noise as though to 'rouse' the judge. Rouse he did and fixed us all with a stare that would not be out of place in a Dracula film. It is a stare I will long remember.Tony O'Neill, Kells, Ireland

 
On November 1st, unanimously and without a vote, the representatives of the 191 nations making up the UN adopted - or let be adopted - an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th "International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust". Moreover, the resolution "Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part".

No nation in the world has made fun of the UN like “Israel”, a state that, however, owes its creation to … the UN. The Jewish State, with an incomparable gall (in Jewish parlance: chutzpah), has thrown a record number of United Nations “resolutions” straight into the bin. In violation of international law, this State, founded on the "history" of the “Holocaust”, practises colonialism, racism, apartheid, military occupation and torture. We may add that it possesses an arsenal of atomic weapons and on this score has, for example, in the last few years been supplied by Germany, free of charge, in the name of the said “Holocaust”, with three ultra-modern submarines fitted out for nuclear armament. The collusion between, on the one hand, the Jewish State and armed forces and, on the other hand, the German State and armed forces has become such that the German mail service has just released a stamp, for the most regular rate of postage, depicting, on the left, the Israeli flag, then, on the right, the German flag and, finally, linking the two, a strand of barbed wire, symbol of the perpetual “Holocaust”. Germany is becoming the Jewish State’s “Guantanamo”.Prof. Robert Faurisson


 Political heretics being rounded up So why the sudden clampdown on Revisionists, and why now? It’s been suggested that the Internet has panicked the Zionists, who to a large extent owe their power and influence to the Holocaust. After all, Israel was founded on its memory and if it’s proven to be a lie, or at least a gross exaggeration, the power the Zionists' hold over ordinary Jews could be undermined. For the very notion of the Holocaust has been used not only to extract financial redress from other nations but also to keep ordinary Jews compliant. In effect, it has become like a grotesque doll wielded by witch doctors, used to keep individuals from asking too many questions, from thinking for themselves, or stepping out of line.

Formally the likes of Ernst Zundel might have been written off as cranks or extremists but the Internet changed that. It allows isolated individuals to question, often quite convincingly, the official line touted by the establishment and the mainstream media. Moreover, the Internet illustrates that the accused are not “Holocaust deniers” – in the sense that they deny the Holocaust ever took place – or “right wing extremists” intent on resurrecting the Third Reich. That’s what the mainstream media would have us believe, but almost without exception, the accused admit that the Nazis were guilty of gross human rights abuses. What’s at issue here are the numbers of dead, how they died, and whether there was any clear plan of genocide at all. In effect these men were engaged in historical inquiry, trying to establish the truth and broadcasting their findings, and that cannot be allowed in the New World Order.

Without even questioning what happened during the Holocaust, we should be asking ourselves: if it’s necessary to exact such draconian measures against those who ask questions, what exactly is being protected? Are historical truths and the memory of Holocaust victims being defended, or is it one of the foundations of the New World Order, or Zionist power?

Finally, a 1948 Red Cross report details nearly a quarter of a million Jews died in Nazi concentration camps but found no evidence of Genocide. This is in distinct contrast to the figure touted nowadays by the mainstream media and portrayed by Hollywood. At the time, the Red Cross was a neutral body with no political axe to grind, so why the difference? And we need to ask ourselves not only why there is such a difference in the numbers, but also why those who ask
such questions are being silenced?

Like they say: “he who controls the past, controls the present…” and our perception of past events shapes the way we look at the world around us now. The Zionists understand this and know that the idea of the “Holocaust” is crucial to their power.Rixon Stewart


BELSEN CONCENTRATION CAMP APRIL 1945
BBC NEWS WORLD EDITION, Friday, 15 April, 2005,

Originally built in 1943 for 8,000 inmates, about 60,000 Jewish inmates were transported to Belsen during late 1944 and early 1945 from concentration camps.

When the troops arrived in April 1945, it was a camp infested with typhus, dysentery and tuberculosis.

'Pitiful tales'

Dr MacAuslan, who wrote an account of his short time in Belsen once back in the UK, said the inmates used to call out in German, "Doctor, doctor, please, please" as he passed by. "They would touch our sleeves as we went past, and cry for us to come back so that they could tell their pitiful tales again, how their husbands had been flogged to death, their relatives killed. The photographs and newsreel footage taken at Belsen and other camps led to widespread and intense revulsion towards Nazi Germany and Germans in general.

"Nobody in Britain had any idea of this. We knew people were locked up, but not like this," said the 83-year-old retired doctor. "We relief people did what we had to do but I came away with great admiration for the internees - they were magnificent to have survived that sort of thing. Any sort of heroics was done by them."

The final act the British troops performed at Belsen, 60km (37 miles) north-east of Hanover, was to burn it down. This was to prevent lice rampant in the installation from spreading the typhus epidemic further. The site is now a memorial garden.

BLOGGER
"I am going to hurl the defy on this. I dare the same people who orchestrated the arrests of Irving, Zundel, Rudolph, and Verbeke, to kidnap and imprison the International Red Cross for "Holocaust denial" because the Red Cross had complete access to all German camps during WW2 and their official report does not support the orthodox account of the holocaust. Therefore, they are equally guilty of "denying" the holocaust, as guilty as Zundel or Irving.

Likewise too, the curators of the Auschwitz museum must also be guilty of "Holocaust denial" because in 1990 the Auschwitz museum, working from the camp records, revised the estimated number of dead downward from four million to one and one half million. This new number directly contradicts the popularized orthodox account. So, if Zundel and Irving are guilty of "Holocaust denial" by looking at the actual available facts, so too are the curators of the Auschwitz museum." wrh.com