The Washington gadfly
By Michael Posner
Hersh recently got hold of a copy of the United
Nations interim report by German prosecutor Detlev Mehlis
on the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister
Rafik Hariri. The document cited "converging
evidence" that senior levels of the Syrian
government were involved in the murder.But according to
Hersh, the Mehlis report is built on the same aenemic
foundations as Powell's UN presentation in February,
2003. "He is relying on intercepts of an unnamed
source inside the Iranianvair force, someone without
inside stuff. It's not empirical."
Globe and Mail
31 October 2005
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20051031.
wxhersh31/BNStory/Entertainment/
Seymour Hersh, one of journalism's crankier bulldogs, was
in an upbeat mood. At least for him. A confidential,
well-placed source had told him that U.S. special
prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's
22-month inquiry into the outing of former CIA agent
Valerie Plame, wife of ex-diplomat Joseph Wilson IV,
would go further than anyone had heretofore thought.
"He's going to save America," Hersh predicted,
on the phone from his home in Washington, just days
before Fitzgerald announced indictments against I. Lewis
(Scooter) Libby, U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney's chief
of staff, on Friday.
"Because it's not just about Wilson,"
maintained Hersh, who, as a New York Times reporter in
the late 1960s, first blew the lid off the My Lai
massacre in Vietnam and, more recently, exposed abuses at
Abu Ghraib, the prison west of Baghdad where U.S. forces
engaged in torture and humiliation of prisoners. He
appears in Toronto tomorrow to speak to the group
Canadian Journalists for Free Expression.
"Fitzgerald's going deep. He may just unravel the
whole conspiracy," continues Hersh, who might be
proven right. While Libby resigned after being indicted
for perjury, obstruction of justice and making false
statements, Fitzgerald continues to investigate Karl
Rove, President George W. Bush's influential deputy chief
of staff.
All this to determine whether senior White House
operatives leaked Valerie Plame's name to select
reporters in order to discredit her husband, Wilson.
Wilson had previously been dispatched by the Bush
administration to Africa to verify reports that Saddam
Hussein was buying nuclear technology from Niger, but had
found no evidence to support those allegations. In a
subsequent op-ed piece in The New York Times, he
questioned the legitimacy of America's war in Iraq.
But Hersh said last week that the Plame/Wilson affair was
only part of the saga. At its heart, the whole conspiracy
-- in the minds of blue-state Americans that revile the
George Bush presidency --
encompasses the notion that the Iraq war was planned and
orchestrated long before the administration began to
build its case for regime change; and that the case it
attempted to build, as laid out by former secretary of
state Colin Powell to the United Nations, was essentially
a fraud (and known to be a fraud).
Two thousand U.S. military personnel and tens of
thousands of Iraqis have since died in what many would
thus consider an illegal war. In Hersh's eyes, anything
that might hasten the departure of its chief architects,
the hated neocons, would be welcome.
"We're so out of control," he says of the
United States. "We have a colossus out of control.
It's the end of the world, brought to you by the
neocons."
Hersh recently got hold of a copy of the United Nations
interim report by German prosecutor Detlev Mehlis on the
assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik
Hariri. The document cited "converging
evidence" that senior levels of the Syrian
government were involved in the murder.
But according to Hersh, the Mehlis report is built on the
same aenemic foundations as Powell's UN presentation in
February, 2003. "He is relying on intercepts of an
unnamed source inside the Iranianvair force, someone
without inside stuff. It's not empirical." On the
basis of this thin evidence, he says, the Bush
administration is campaigning at the UN for sanctions on
Syria.
But what seems to gall him even more is the behaviour of
the American press, not excluding his alma mater, the
Times -- Hersh now writes mainly for The New Yorker.
"The problems there go way beyond Judith
Miller," he says, referring to the Times reporter
jailed for 85 days for refusing to disclose the name of
the White House source who is alleged to have leaked
Valerie Plame's name. She was released only after one of
her sources, Lewis Libby, signed a personal waiver
allowing her to discuss their conversations with
prosecutor Fitzgerald. The Miller affair has caused a
serious internal rift at the Times and, says Hersh,
damaged its reputation. "It's still the most
important newspaper in America," he says. "But
it was the standard bearer, and I don't get that sense
now."
Meanwhile, about to sign a contract for a new book on
Iraq, Hersh is pleased to find that he's no longer a
lonely voice on the issues. "I'm almost
superfluous," he says. "A lot of stuff I was
writing
about, everybody is now writing about. So I'm just
sitting back collecting notes for the book."
Still, he thinks his colleagues in the press are missing
something in Iraq. The so-called insurgency isn't rooted,
he maintains, in "Jihadism." It's about the
Sunnis making a stand against the Shia. "Ninety per
cent of the Arab world is Sunni. They do not want another
Shia society and Shia government that dominates the oil.
That's the real issue."
America's current troubles in Iraq might be less severe,
he says, if Al Gore had won the election. But Hersh is
under no illusions. Even before Bush, "the Clinton
administration had made it repeatedly clear that it was
interested in only one thing in Iraq -- regime change.
And Al Gore was part of that policy."
Although Bush is sometimes seen as a political
marionette, manipulated by unseen masters, Hersh isn't so
sure. He recalls a Saturday Night Live skit from the
Reagan years that portrayed the then-president as a
doddering fool who, once the cameras were off and the
doors closed, calls a National Security council meeting,
starts speaking Chinese and gives a detailed assessment
of strategic threats.
"So sometimes I wonder," says Hersh. In
Toronto, he says, he will talk about responsibility and
war crimes and "make the case that gets Bush in the
middle of it. There is a case for the President's
direct participation. It's not something that happened
without his acquiescence. I'd like to think he knows
what's going on."
In the meantime (Hersh is waiting to see if Fitzgerald
drops more indictment bombs), "he's the sleeper, a
true unassailable. The White House calls him Eliot Ness
[the Prohibition-era federal agent whose team of
'Untouchables' helped bring down mobster Al Capone], not
with affection, so I've heard."
Hersh predicts that "every day will get worse in
Iraq. Another 30,000 Iraqis will die if we keep going.
Fewer will die if we get out. There are only two options,
as I see it: Pull out now or pull
out tomorrow."
Seymour Hersh speaks at the Canadian Journalists for
Free Expression
Gala tomorrow, at the Arcadian Court in Toronto
|