THE HANDSTAND

FEBRUARY-MARCH2010


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

BY GILAD ATZMON

SATURDAY, JANUARY 30, 2010

The UK Jewish Chronicle is apparently stupid enough to unveil the ferocity of Zionist lobbying within the British Government and its corridors of power. The Jewish weekly is happy to outline the relentless measures that are being taken by Jewish lobbyists in order to Zionise the British legal system and its value system.

As one may assume the supporters of Israel in Britain are far from happy about Britain’s magistrates being able to implement ‘universal jurisdiction’ laws, laws that allow local magistrates to issue arrest warrants for high profile foreign visitors accused of war crimes. The rabid Zionist Jewish Chronicle is obviously outraged because universal jurisdiction puts most of the Israeli political and military echelon at a severe risk. Last month ex Israeli Foreign minister Mrs. Tzipi Livini cancelled her visit to Britain over fears that arrest warrants would be issued in connection with accusations of war crimes under laws of universal jurisdiction.

Surely universal jurisdiction is not a bad thing. It is actually an ethically orientated idea that is there to prevent world leaders from abusing their powers and committing crimes against humanity. It is also there to chase war criminals and to stop them from celebrating their freedom. Yet, it is not very surprising that the only political lobby in Britain that acts against such a set of universal laws is the Zionist lobby.

While in the past Zionist activists tried to hide their conspiratorial actions, JC political editor Martin Bright and Chief editor Stephen Pollard are providing us with a glimpse into the Jewish relentless political activity here. “Will the government ever act?” they ask in their latest editorial as if the British government has to act in order to satisfy the Zionist will. 

Interestingly enough, the JC editors do not offer a single ideological, ethical or legal argument suggesting what is wrong with laws of universal jurisdiction except suggesting that it is not good for the Jews or Israel.

The JC is rather outraged with Justice Secretary Jack Straw who apparently fails to bow to Israeli pressure. Considering Jack Straw is of  Jewish descent, the JC must believe that it is entitled to use some measures to put him in the line of fire. In spite of the fact that Straw is known in Britain for his notorious call for Muslim women to remove their veils and also as a backer of the illegal invasion of Iraq. The JC blames Straw for being too friendly with Muslims. “Mr Straw is known to be highly sensitive to the views of his Muslim constituents in Blackburn and is close to the Muslim Council of Britain, which opposes a change to the law.”

The JC should have also accepted the fact that, bearing in mind Straw’s Jewish origin, it is just natural for him to be reluctant to put a change into British law that is there to solely to serve Israeli interests and stands in total opposition to every universal and ethical value.

According to the JC, the Jews of Britain should not be too worried. The Shadow Middle East minister David Lidington is already in their pockets. ”This has to be sorted and quickly”, says the shadow man. “It is very clear to me that this issue is doing serious damage to relations with Israel”.

The JC also assures its Zionist readers that they have a man within the government who is working hard serving their interests willingly and even enthusiastically. David Miliband, the British foreign minister who is also listed as an “Israeli Propaganda (Hasbara) author’ on an Israeli official Hasbara site already announced his intention to change the law late last year. According to the JC he is “pushing hard within Whitehall for a solution”. Earlier this month, says the JC “the Foreign Office briefed that an announcement of the law change was imminent”. I wouldn’t except less from a listed ‘Hasbara author’

 But the JC is taking it even further. In its JC Opinion editorial it says it is “Crystal clear who is to blame” referring to Justice Secretary Straw and PM Brown

 “The time for excuses is over”, says the paper. “For weeks the government has been giving every possible off-the-record promise that it would change the law on universal jurisdiction. No longer would unsuitable magistrates be able to issue warrants for the arrest of some of our closest allies”. One may wonder why exactly ‘on the record’ genocidal murderers such as Livni, Barak or Olmert should be considered as ‘Britain closest allies’. In fact these people are primary enemies of humanity and as such they are also the enemy of Britain and any other  nation.

Seemingly, the JC, doesn’t just talk on behalf of its editors. For some reason it prefers to talk in the name of the ‘Jewish community’. “Mr Straw must take the Jewish community for mugs if he thinks his behaviour is not transparent”. The only possible interpretation of this statement is that British Jewry wants Britain to give up on universal Jurisdiction just to appease its Zionists.

In case PM Brown is slightly confused and doesn’t know how to react, the JC is there to tell him how he should run Britain just to keep the Jewish community happy. “As for the Prime Minister: all he has ever needed to do is make clear that he backs Mr Miliband, and the issue would have been over”. Considering Miliband is listed as an ‘Israeli Propaganda author’ the message here is clear. Britain better start to work for Israel and even change its laws accordingly so it can easily comply with Israeli unethical conduct.

Britain is heading towards election, and the JC is advising PM Brown that he is about to pay the ultimate political price for his unwillingness to succumb to the Zionist will. “That he (PM Brown) has done precisely nothing since promising action speaks volumes about his own bona fides. If - and now it looks like when - the deadline for action passes and nothing is done, it will be crystal clear who is to blame.”

In plain language the JC is suggesting that PM Brown as far as the Jews are concerned, is basically finished. I wonder how long it will take for British people to wake up and say enough is enough. How long will it take before they say NO to Israeli and Zionist infiltration into their politics, laws and value system.

 

Lord Hutton's 70-Year Seal on Medical Records of Dr. David Kelly to be lifted

 

By WILLIAM F. WERTZ & DAVID CHERRY

 

Monday, February 1, 2010

 

http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13340

 

Less than a week after it was revealed that Lord Hutton had requested that a 70-year seal be placed on the medical records relating to the death of bio-weapons expert Dr. David Kelly in 2003 -- in a blatant effort to prevent an investigation as to whether he was in fact murdered because of his exposure of the Blair government's lies about weapons of mass destruction to justify the invasion of Iraq -- it has now been reported in the British press that the Ministry of Justice is conducting a review to overturn the ban on post-mortem reports by Dr. Nicholas Hunt, a pathologist, photographs, and other medical documents.

A letter from a senior official at Oxfordshire County Council had first revealed that Lord Hutton had requested that records provided to the inquiry that were not produced in evidence should be closed for 30 years and that the medical reports, including the post-mortem reports and photographs, be closed for 70 years. But last night, the doctors heard through their lawyers that the evidence would be released.

Clearly under tremendous political pressure, Hutton released the following statement: "I consider that the disclosure of the report to doctors and their legal advisers for the purposes of legal proceedings would not undermine the protection which I wished to give to Dr. Kelly's family, provided that conditions were imposed restricting the use and publication of the report to such proceedings, and I have written to the Ministry of Justice to this effect."

The doctors are applying to the Attorney General, Baroness Scotland, for permission to go to the High Court for a new inquest, or the resumption of the previous inquest. Their case rests on Section 13 of the 1988 Coroners Act, which allows the High Court to order a new inquest, or to resume a previous inquest, in special cases. No coroner's inquest was ever held into Dr Kelly's death.

Last year, the six doctors published a medical dossier saying that Lord Hutton's conclusion -- that Dr. Kelly killed himself by severing the ulnar artery in his left wrist after taking an overdose of prescription painkillers -- was untenable because the artery is small and hard to access, and severing it would not in any case cause death.

The Herald Express reports that retired surgeon David Halpin, who is among senior doctors taking legal action to force a coroner's inquest, said: "This is an unexpected decision but from my point of view the autopsy is only part of what we want to see." Halpin also said the results of a chemical analysis of Dr. Kelly's body and blood will also be needed. He added: "After six years, we have never given up. We have laws in this land and us six doctors are trying our very best to make sure that the law is upheld in the case of Dr. Kelly."

Dr. Michael Powers, QC, also one of the doctors involved, said on Saturday: "Obviously we welcome this news that Lord Hutton is now going to disclose the medical reports and any post-mortem reports. We particularly welcome it if it can be assured that we shall have access to all the material, so that we can consider it. We are grateful to Lord Hutton for his change of mind, but if we are to be given access to post-mortem reports we need to consider all the medical and scientific evidence obtained after Dr. Kelly's death. There can be no justification for partial disclosure other than national security, and how could that be relevant to suicide?"