The fragile planet:
        Thoughts of a green prophet 
        Back in the 1970s,
        Barry Commoner was one of the first environmentalists to
        warn that the earth had limits - and human society was on
        course to exceed them. Now, as he turns 90, his message
        is more relevant than ever. By Michael McCarthy reports 
        Published: 20
        June 2007 
        Here's a green
        landmark: one of the modern environment movement's early
        prophets, and most original thinkers, has turned 90.
        Barry Commoner, distinguished cellular biologist, leading
        eco-campaigner and one-time US presidential candidate,
        was among the formulators of the green movement's
        essential message, which we could characterise like this:
        there is only so much that the earth can take.  
        He is still
        sending out his message loud and clear. Remarkably active
        both in body and mind, still regularly commuting to the
        Centre for the Biology of Natural Systems at the City
        University of New York (he stepped down as director in
        2000 at the age of 83), he gave an interview to The New
        York Times yesterday in which he surveyed the world of
        the 21st century with a mixture of hope and pessimism. 
        His is a key
        viewpoint. When the history of environmentalism is
        definitively written, one theme above all others, which
        Professor Commoner helped to shape, will stand out: the
        realisation, so long in coming for humankind, that the
        earth is finite. 
        For millennia,
        there had been the assumption that the planet was
        limitless, and we could plunder its natural resources,
        from fish to forests, without any fear of them running
        out; we could dump waste to our heart's content on the
        land and the sea, and it would be absorbed without harm;
        we could dream up an infinity of new inventions and be
        heedless of their side-effects. 
        But Commoner
        was one of a group of visionaries who in the 1960s and
        1970s saw that this assumption was dangerously wrong. 
        Three key
        events mark out modern environmentalism' s beginnings.
        The first was the publication in 1962 of Silent Spring,
        the devastating indictment of the effects of large-scale
        spraying of agricultural pesticide on American wildlife
        by Rachel Carson (the centenary of whose birth was
        celebrated last month). That woke people up to the fact
        that we were visibly harming the natural world on a large
        scale. The second was the taking of the first pictures of
        the earth from a distance, captured by the astronauts of
        the US Apollo 8 spacecraft in December 1968, returning
        from their trip around the moon. For the first time ever
        humanity saw its only home, an exquisite blue sphere
        hanging in the blackness of space, which more than
        anything seemed small and immensely fragile. 
        And the third
        was the 1972 publication, by a small group of thinkers
        calling themselves the Club of Rome, of The Limits to
        Growth, an analysis of the world's natural resource
        supply, which claimed that with rapidly increasing rates
        of consumption, key commodities, from oil to coal, would
        run out within decades. 
        These
        predictions were soon proved wrong, but what the book had
        done was to stamp indelibly in the human consciousness
        the idea that even though it might be a long way off, in
        the end there was a limit to what the Earth could
        provide. 
        There was a
        fourth event also, influential at the time, but now
        largely ignored: the 1968 publication of The Population
        Bomb, by the biologist Paul Ehrlich, who claimed that
        rapidly rising populations would lead to the death by
        mass starvation of tens of millions of people in the
        1970s and 1980s. Ehrlich's predictions, like those of the
        Club of Rome, were soon found to be wide of the mark, but
        his thesis similarly established a general idea: that the
        pressure of human numbers would start to affect the
        planet seriously. 
        Into this
        awakening consciousness of the earth's vulnerability,
        Commoner added two further insights: the specific dangers
        of technology, and the fact that when dealing with the
        natural environment, there is no free lunch. 
        As a professor
        at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, he had
        come to environmentalism through opposition to nuclear
        weapons testing, being particularly concerned with the
        effects on the environment of radioactive fall-out from
        atmospheric tests in the continental US (which before the
        nuclear test-ban treaty of 1963 were regular
        occurrences). 
        Commoner set up
        a committee to obtain details about the results of the
        tests, many of which had been kept secret, and
        established that they could lead to a build-up of
        radioactivity in humans. This itself helped bring about
        the test-ban treaty, But his concerns broadened to other
        malign effects of technologies such as industrial
        pollution, and he set out his stall in a celebrated book,
        Science and Survival, published in 1967, which sounded an
        alarm about the deployment of technology before the
        side-effects had been properly thought through. 
        It turned him
        into a prophet - he made the cover of Time magazine in
        1970 when that really meant something - and then he went
        further with what is regarded as his classic work, The
        Closing Circle, published in 1971. Here he argued that
        there were three possible causes of environmental
        degradation: population growth, increasing affluence, and
        modern technology. The last was the key factor, he said
        (sparking a public debate with Paul Ehrlich). 
        More
        significantly still, he pointed out memorably the reason
        why phenomena such as large-scale industrial production
        caused such harm: because the waste products could not be
        made to disappear. When you threw something away, he
        said, there was really no "away" to throw it
        to; it had to go somewhere in the biosphere, the thin
        layer of life enveloping the Earth. 
        This insight
        led him to formulate his Four Laws of Ecology, which
        became his most memorable statement. They are: 
        1. Everything
        is Connected to Everything Else. There is only one
        biosphere for all living things and what affects one,
        affects all. 
        2. Everything
        Must Go Somewhere . The idea that waste products can be
        made to disappear is an illusion. 
        3. Nature Knows
        Best. People have tried to fashion technology to improve
        upon nature, but such change in a natural system is
        "likely to be detrimental to that system,"
        Commoner says. 
        4. There Is No
        Such Thing as a Free Lunch. In the natural world, for
        every gain there is a cost, and all debts are eventually
        paid; both sides of the equation must balance. 
        From here
        Commoner went on to understand that products needed to be
        seen over the whole of their life-cycle; he was one of
        the very first advocates of recycling. His thinking had a
        considerable effect on the first generation of British
        environmentalists, such as the energy guru Walt
        Patterson, the green campaigner Tom Burke and Jonathon
        Porritt, now chairman of the Government's green watchdog
        body, the Sustainable Development Commission. 
        "The
        Closing Circle was an amazing book," Jonathon
        Porritt said yesterday. "Barry Commoner was one of
        the first people to understand how materials flow through
        nature and through society, and to say that 'to chuck
        away' was a really dangerous concept, because there was
        no 'away' - it all had to be dealt with within the whole
        of nature. He was a really early holistic thinker." 
        Professor
        Commoner went on to have a go at becoming President
        Commoner - he stood for the Citizens' Party in the 1980
        US presidential election (in which the Democrat incumbent
        Jimmy Carter was beaten by the Republican Ronald Reagan.)
        He polled 233,052 votes (0.27 per cent of the total) and
        the highlight of the campaign, he told The New York Times
        yesterday, was in Albuquerque, New Mexico, when a local
        reporter asked him: "Dr Commoner, are you a serious
        candidate or are you just running on the issues?" 
        His interviewer
        reminded him that in 1970 he had said: "We have the
        time - perhaps a generation - in which to save the
        environment from the final effects of the violence we
        have done to it", and asked him for his view today. 
        He replied:
        "We've really failed to do more than a few specific
        things. We don't use DDT on the farm any more. We don't
        use lead in gasoline anymore. Environmental pollution is
        an incurable disease. It can only be prevented. And
        prevention can only take place at the point of
        production. If you insist on using DDT, the only thing
        you can do is stop. The rest has really been sort of
        forgotten about. Except that now, global warming has sort
        of consolidated the independent environmental hazards
        that many of us had been working on all of these
        years." He went on: If you ask what you are going to
        do about global warming, the only rational answer is to
        change the way in which we do transportation, energy
        production, agriculture and a good deal of manufacturing.
        The problem originates in human activity in the form of
        the production of goods. 
        "The
        Chinese like to say, 'Crisis means change'. It means you
        can get things done. Unfortunately, I think that most of
        the 'greening' that we see so much of now has failed to
        look back on arguments such as my own - that action has
        to be taken on what's produced and how it's produced.
        That's unfortunate, but I'm an eternal optimist, and I
        think eventually people will come around." 
        Asked what he
        thought of the debate in the United States over the
        extent to which humans are primarily responsible for
        global warming, he said: "No one in his right mind
        would deny that we're getting warmer. The question is, is
        this due to things that people have chosen? And I think
        the answer is that all of the things we have chosen to do
        include the release of materials like carbon dioxide,
        which affect the retention of heat by the planet. 
        "You could
        argue that maybe this is a high point in a
        heating/cooling cycle. Well, we're adding to the high
        point. There's no question about it. So it seems to me
        the argument that there are natural ways in which the
        temperature fluctuates is a spurious one. If we accept
        that we're in a cycle, it's idiocy to increase the high
        point." 
        Asked if he had
        ever been tempted to run for President again, Commoner
        said: "Often. Every time Bush does anything, I feel
        I should have won." 
        Commoner's Four
        Ecology Laws 
        1. Everything
        is Connected to Everything Else 
        2. Everything
        Must Go Somewhere 
        3. Nature Knows
        Best 
        4.
        There Is No Such Thing as a Free Lunch Emailing The fragile planet Thoughts of
        a green prophet - Independent Online Edition Climate
        Change.htm 
         
          
         |