THE HANDSTAND | OCTOBER 2005 |
IRAQ - U.S.MASSACRE AND THEN...VENGEANCE; A CYCLE THAT MUST BE BROKEN Do you remember: the children from Talafar whose parents were killed by troops in January? Have you read this?:In his book Arab and Jew, David K. Shipler, who served the New York Times :(correspondent in Israel,)writes: "As the 11 and 12-year-old boys in Kiryat Arba explained, they are learning in their yeshivas that the Arab is Amalek, the enemy tribe that God instructed the Jews to fight eternally and destroy: `Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish forever.' (Numbers 24:20). Hagai Segal, a settler from Ofra, was quoted in the settlers' paper Nekuda as declaring, `The Torah of Israel has nothing to do with modern humanistic atheism. The Torah yearns for revenge. Such a Torah is not humanistic.' Expressions of bellicose intolerance are given religious sanction and rationalization, which then filter into some segments of the lay population. Some rabbis, such as Eliezer Waldenberg, winner of the 1976 Israel Prize, declared that Halakha, Jewish law, required a strict separation of Jews from Arabs, preferably an apatheid system,or, better yet, the expulsion of the `goyim,' all non-Jews, from Jerusalem....Another rabbi writing in the student newspaper at Bar-Ilan University argued that the Torah prescribed genocide against the modern Amalek." NOW: Thousands displaced from Talafar by fighting Report, IRIN, 12 September 2005 Vengeance... Scores killed in Baghdad attacks Hundreds killed and wounded in a series of bomb attacks and shootings across Iraq. In the worst incident, at least 112 people were killed and some 160 injured when a car bomb exploded in Baghdad's mainly Shia district of Kadhimiya. During the night, gunmen killed 17 men
in the nearby town of Taji after dragging them from their
homes. Wednesday became one of the deadliest days in Iraq since the US-led invasion in March 2003. Tal Afar: Crackdown in the Sunni Heartland By Mike Whitney Al-Jazeerah, September 14, 2005
The siege of Tal Afar follows a familiar pattern of brutal American incursions into densely populated areas under the pretense of fighting terrorism. It is a ritual that is repeated endlessly despite the dismal results. The Pentagon seems to prefer these grand displays of military strength to anything that might produce a political solution. It brings to mind the old saw, The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again; expecting a different result. This appears to be the guiding principle of the Defense Dept. with Tal Afar serving as the most recent example. In the present case, a city of 250,000 has been almost entirely evacuated following weeks of artillery bombardment, aerial bombing raids, downed power-lines and water-system, and house-to-house searches. Ho-hum. Such paltry events never even reach the front page of American newspapers where the ceremony of American suffering is the only topic of interest. The remaining occupants of the city have reported the killing and maiming of innocent women and children, the use of chemical weapons, and the predictable destruction of Mosques and holy sites. In Tal Afar the Pentagons Hearts and Minds program seems to be running at high-gear. There was no doubt that Donald
Rumsfeld would use the cover of Hurricane Katrina to
mount a massive attack in Iraq, and he didnt
disappoint. The military conducted a 10,000 man invasion
only to find that the city had been abandoned and that
the Iraqi resistance had slipped away without incident.
Not one foreign fighter was captured during the siege
despite claims that the city was a haven for foreign
terrorists. Colonel Greg Reilly told Al Jazeera that the resistance went into hiding, avoiding us. Thats why theres no fighting .They are not putting up a fight. Did OReilly really expect the
poorly-armed resistance to march into battle against
Abrams tanks, helicopter gun-ships, and F-18s? The
resistance applied classic guerilla tactics and
melted away before they were confronted by
the greater force leaving the Marines with nothing to
show for their effort except a few random prisoners.
Nevertheless, this hasnt persuaded the Pentagon to
modify their plans of savaging the Iraqs Prime Minister Al Jaafari has shown a surprising enthusiasm for the Rumsfelds blitzkrieg against the Sunnis. He gave the siege of Tal Afar his personal blessing and said that the hostilities were being conducted on his orders. He also announced that he was contributing thousands of newly-graduated Iraqi soldiers to the war-effort, even though his decision is bound to be unpopular among the Iraqi public. Al-Jaafari has now put himself in the same position as his predecessor, Iyad Allawi, who lost all credibility when he authorized the invasion of Falluja. This shows the shortsightedness of
the current plan. If Rumsfeld wants to pass off
al-Jaafari as a viable political candidate, he must
appear to be independent of American influence. By
endorsing the attack on Tal Afar, al-Jaafari looks like
just another American stooge carrying water for the
occupation. Ultimately, this will undermine his
legitimacy and disrupt the plan to create a credible
Arab façade to disguise the administrations
intentions. Theres very little to discuss about the botched siege of Tal Afar. The assault follows the same basic blueprint of jack-boot tactics weve seen in similar acts of American aggression. Tens of thousands of lives were disrupted and possibly ruined through forced evacuation, massive property damage has been sustained throughout the city, the mayor resigned in protest of the invasion, the public is more polarized than ever, 152 people were killed in the bombing with countless others detained indefinitely, the resistance fighters escaped unscathed, and the Red Cross reports that the offensive has created a humanitarian crisis that is beyond their limited resources. In other words, the entire operation was an utter failure. The media has kept Tal Afar off the front page and framed the debacle as another crucial step in liberating Iraq from the disparate forces of terrorism. What nonsense. Apart from the conspicuous immorality of the action, the stupidity is almost too hard to bear. Tar Afar is simply a duplication of the same failed policy we have seen over and over again for the last two years. Has anyone in the Pentagon ever read Che Guevara or any of the other classic tomes of guerrilla warfare? Why are the same futile policies being replicated day by day when we already know that they are doomed to failure? Is the fog of hubris so thick at the Defense Dept that they believe that the assault on Tal Afar accomplished anything? Rumsfelds simian theories of warfare have proved to be the greatest boon to the burgeoning Iraqi resistance. Like all headstrong amateurs he soldiers-on; ignoring adversity or experience, determined to demonstrate the wisdom of his own narrow vision. Regrettably, that vision is comprised of nothing more than ever-increasing levels of violence erratically extended across the region. Theres nothing more dangerous
than a well-armed dilettante who is convinced of his own
genius. Tal Afar leaves no doubt about that.
|