BUSH IN A
BOTTLE
John Chuckman
There have been rumors of Bush taking
to the bottle again. Since alcoholics are never cured,
this is possible. The stress of having his ineptitude so
publicly displayed as it was in New Orleans and of having
his every major policy collapsing before his eyes would
certainly tend to push him in this direction.
There are also rumors of very ugly
behavior towards associates and especially anyone
bringing unwelcome news.
These rumors have sparked stories of
the dangers of a drunken President, but I think these
stories are misguided. If true, Bush's drinking is a
development we should welcome. There is, in fact, less
danger from a drunken Bush, and his return to drinking
would provide one of the most fitting possible outcomes
for his destructive, miserable time in office, a
political version, if you will, of time wounds all heels.
His handlers will not allow him to do
anything truly dangerous. Neo-cons are moral ciphers, but
they are not suicidal. Remember the precautions taken
during Nixon's last days in office when he was gulping
whiskey by the tumbler? Not only will a Bush back on the
bottle effectively be side-lined, but all his ghastly
entourage will be forced to spend their remaining time
trying to hide the facts.
In the meantime, I think it would be
helpful, as well as a fitting political statement, for
all concerned Americans who can afford the cost to send a
gift bottle of Bourbon to the White House. Who knows, it
might just speed things along?
Blame Katrina!
THE DISH vol 8. No.39
www.thedish.org
No one wants to take the blame for the slow national
response to the dire predicament of the victims of
hurricane Katrina. With all those poor folks wading in
water screaming for help, roasting on rooftops and
huddled in pitiful masses like residents of some
Third-World country, the US' image took another serious
hit on George W. Bush's watch. Even Karen Hughes
may find it difficult to mend it.
As a consequence of Katrina, for the first time in nearly
five years in office, Bush is paying lip service to
grinding poverty in the US gulf region. Like 9-11,
Bush is belatedly all over the natural disaster, even
though there has been no opportunity to stand on a pile
of rubble with a bullhorn to threaten Mother Nature with
armed retaliation.
With his leadership and his approval ratings in the
toilet, no one would be surprised if he declared another
war. However, a war on poverty would mean adopting
programs that benefit the poor. Actually improving
conditions for the poor would entail changing the
nation's distribution of income, a thought certain to
offend Bush and his base's trickle-down capitalist
sensibilities.
Despite all his grandiose speeches, it is hard to imagine
Bush jettisoning his conservative agenda, i.e.,
dismantling the New Deal's Social Security and other
social welfare programs, and instead devising some clever
programs that benefit the less fortunate.
On closer inspection, what Bush is really proposing will
do little to change the nation's distribution of
income. Given some of the hinted at plans to
rebuild the Gulf Coast, a boatload of no-bid contracts or
bids for buddies, including Bush pal, Mississippi
Governor Haley Barbour, will make the rich richer.
And, we can blame Katrina, a hurricane with a
ghetto-girl's name. How ironic!
First, Bush has proposed reimbursing faith-based
organizations for their good works, a prospect that turns
the whole concept of charitable giving on its head.
It makes churches, synagogues and mosques, if they
qualify, no different than other corporations that sup at
the federal trough.
A lot of things, otherwise unthinkable, are being
contemplated and justified because of Katrina. For
instance, deploying military forces in a natural
disaster, rather than the National Guard. This
could be the end of posse comitatus, which prohibits
using soldiers to police civilians. Its demise
has been on the neo-con agenda and discussed on blogs
since 9-11. On cue, like trained pups, some members
of Congress will introduce legislation that uses Katrina
to justify amending posse comitatus.
Likewise, conservatives will push for the use of federal
dollars to fund private and religious schools.
Every since whites fled urban areas and inner city public
education, there has been an effort afoot to help fund
private and religious schools. The Katrina tragedy
will provide one more
opportunity for conservatives to bring up school
vouchers. Look for it in your local news.
In the final analysis, after the glare of national
attention fades, poor folks rescued from the wrath of
Katrina will be forgotten. Many will languish in
FEMA-furnished trail parks, their fortunes little changed
even after the nation spends more than $200 billion.
Disgruntled feels: Cheap! Talk is cheap! Less
than an expensive pair of shoes; it costs nothing to
dismiss black folks in New Orleans singing the
blues. In the role she knows best, Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice went to Alabama to put a black
face with a voice saying, 'Bush cares about black
people.' Someone needs to inform Condie that she
has served in this black-face capacity a few times to
many. She has lost her credibility, if she had
any. Now, instead of being the nation's diplomat,
Karen Hughes fills her shoes, and Condie is reduced to
talking to folks in the cheap seats, 'cause no one else
will listen.
Disgruntled wants to know: George W. Bush pledged to
spend whatever it takes to rebuild the Gulf Coast
region. The possibility of spending $200 billion,
the amount spent killing people in Iraq, is not out of
the question. Current spending and tax cuts will not
change. Deficit spending is the only
other source of funds. When will Federal Reserve
Chairman Alan Greenspan explain to Bush and Congress the
consequences of out-of-control deficit spending?
Disgruntled says: In the immediate aftermath of hurricane
Katrina, Republicans chided critics of the Bush
administration's response for 'playing the blame
game.' It proved to be quite an effective ploy,
much like calling those that did not support the war
'unpatriotic.' Now, it is time to assess the
response to the natural disaster and record lessons
learned; the first thing former FEMA director Michael
Brown does is blame state and local officials for being
dysfunctional. Good grief Charlie
Brown!
Cynthia McKinney
ANSWER, United for Peace and Justice Anti-war Rally
Washington, DC
September 24, 2005
If we didn't know it before, we certainly know it now.
A cruel wind blows across America. Starting in Texas and
Montana, and
sweeping across America's heartland, it's settled here in
Washington,
DC. And despite our presence today, it continues to
buffet and batter
the American people.
This cruel wind blew disenfranchisement into Florida and
Ohio.
It blew hardheartedness into the Capitol.
Division across our land. And wretchedness in high
places.
The American people have been forced to endure fraud in
the elections of 2000 and 2004, criminal neglect on
September 11th, a war started on deliberately-faked
evidence, the outing of a CIA agent to cover up the
truth, and now criminal incompetence in providing
our security.
When hurricane survivors had lost everything, and it was
there for all America to see, sybaritic men, wrapped in
self-righteousness, worked to save their jobs instead of
the people. As dead bodies lay strewn about the New
Orleans Superdome, military recruiters blew into
Houston's Astrodome to reap the harvest.
This ill wind that engulfs our country is also global in
its impact. It dipped into the Caribbean hitting Haiti
and Cuba; it reached into Latin America to slap
Venezuela; it swept death, greed, and destruction across
Africa into Eastern Congo; and it breathes occupation
onto the peoples of Iraq and Palestine.
But just as sure as an ill wind now blows, it doesn't
always have to be so.
The people, united, can stop wars.
We can stop injustice; and we can stop
indifference. The people, united, can tear
down the mightiest walls of oppression.
These ill winds have brought us high crimes and more than
misdemeanors. But they've also brought us together:
one answer, united for peace and for justice.
Let's stay together. Because we have to get rid of these
ill winds and breathe fresh breath into a new jet stream
of life.
We can do it, ya'll, because they can't fool us anymore.
Thank you!
|