
Press round on
Iraq's new leaders
The Middle Eastern press
largely blame US allies in Iraq for a week of
bloodshed in Shia cities though some accuse
radical cleric Moqtada Sadr of aggravating the
situation.
At a time when US forces are
storming Najaf... the position of the Iraqi
transitional government, which is supposed to
look after the interests of the Iraqi people and
restore stability, is like a grenade on the
muzzle of a launcher.
Saudi Arabia - editorial in Al-Watan
*******************************
The storming of Najaf by US
soldiers to arrest followers of the youthful Shia
leader Moqtada Sadr will only inflame the
situation further and will not quell the
resistance against occupation...
It seems the transitional
government did not evaluate the risks involved in
storming Najaf to arrest members of the armed
Mehdi Army, something that led to fires blazing
in other areas like Baghdad, Amara, Diwaniya and
Kut.
Egypt - editorial in Al-Ahram
*******************************
Butchery alone is the only way
to take control and impose authority in Iraq...
Those Iraqis or non-Iraqis who achieved such a
lot by historically overthrowing Saddam today
find themselves promoting Saddamism, without
Saddam.
London-based Al-Hayat -
commentary by Abd-al-Wahab Badrkhan
*******************************
They came to please the Iraqi
people but they have increased their misery... If
US foreign policy continues in this way, it will
ignite a political, security and social blaze
across the world, burning everyone to different
degrees.
London-based Al-Sharq
al-Awsat - commentary by Zayn al-Abidin
*******************************
It is high time an end was put
to the practice of using mosques and other
religious sites for military purposes. To allow
it to continue is to mock people's beliefs. It is
ultimately a cowardly practice more indicative of
a psychotic than a political state.
Iraq - commentary in Al-Sharq
al-Awsat
********************************
Sadr has achieved nothing by
delivering blood and fire to Iraq and Najaf for a
week, desecrating the shrine [of Imam Ali],
destroying the influence of leading Shia clerics
and weakening moderate Shia...
The biggest mistake by the
group led by Sadr, or better to say manipulated
by him, was to take shelter at the Imam Ali
shrine to begin his resistance, and this caused
the assaults on the shrine.
Iran - editorial in Sharq
********************************
From day one, [Iyad] Allawi's
government adopted a method opposed to consensus
and unity. His first option was to play the
sectarian card against Sadr, which coincided with
[Israeli Prime Minister] Sharon-like destruction
of houses in Falluja on the pretext they
harboured terrorists.
London-based Al-Quds
Al-Arabi - commentary by Abd-al-Wahab
al-Afandi
*******************************************************************************
The atrocities the US forces
committed in Falluja and those which the
Anglo-American troops and their allies are
committing today in Najaf and other Iraqi cities
amount to systematic genocide masquerading as
anti-terrorist measures against so-called
infiltrators from neighbouring states: US
allegations readily echoed by a puppet Iraqi
government allied to the US and the host of old
and new colonialists.
Iraq - from commentary by
Mudhir Arif, secretary-general of the Iraqi
Greens Party, in Al-Manar Al-Yawm
*******************************************************************************
Recent developments prove that
the United States does not think about anything
short of full domination over Iraq... What has
encouraged the Americans to continue their
bullying approach is a total lull by
international bodies, most importantly the
Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC).
Iran - editorial in Iran
News
*********************************************************************************
The fact that the agreement
between the Najaf militia and trusted political
groups was violated, indicates that a dangerous
scenario has been planned to suppress and isolate
the country's Shia majority. The provocative acts
came shortly after the illogical remarks of the
Iraqi defence and interior ministers, who claimed
that the Islamic Republic was interfering in
Iraq's internal affairs.
Iran - editorial in Tehran
Times
BBC Monitoring, based in Caversham in southern
England, selects and translates information from
radio, television, press, news agencies and the
Internet from 150 countries in more than 70
languages.

IRAQ'S NEW LEADERS ROUND ON THE PRESS
Police Fire at Reporters as
U.S. Tanks Roll up to Shrine
By Adrian Blomfield
The Telegraph U.K.
Monday 16 August 2004
The bullet that whistled
through the lobby of the Sea Hotel in Najaf
yesterday, embedding shards of glass into a
foreign reporter's cheek before lodging itself in
an air-conditioning unit, carried an
unmistakeable message: "Get out."
Journalists working in Iraq
have long lived with the danger of being targeted
by insurgents fighting US-led forces and their
Iraqi allies. But in Najaf the
roles have been abruptly reversed. Now the Iraqi
police threaten journalists, and the insurgents
welcome them.
As US marines and Iraqi
security forces resumed their operation to evict
insurgents from the Shrine of Ali, the holiest
place in Shia Islam, the Iraqi interim government
decided yesterday to treat the media as the
enemy.
The authoritarian stance
towards the press seems redolent of the days of
Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi government has closed
the offices of al-Jazeera, the most important
Arab satellite station, accusing it of inciting
the insurgents.
In Najaf journalists were
summoned yesterday morning by the city's police
chief, Ghalab al-Jazeera. It was said that he
wanted to parade some captured members of Moqtada
al-Sadr's Mahdi army, who have launched their
second uprising in four months.
Instead the police chief
delivered a blunt warning: journalists had two
hours to leave Najaf or face arrest. Mr Jazeera's
official explanation for the decision was that
police guarding the hotel had found 550 lbof
dynamite in a car nearby. That seems unlikely.
The police rarely venture out
of their stations and the street outside the
hotel is almost always deserted.
Mr Jazeera's expressions of
concern were quickly followed by a thinly veiled
attack on the foreign press.
"We know you are neutral journalists despite
the fact you did not report the bad actions by
Sadr's people when they beheaded and burned
innocent people and the Iraqi police," he
said.
For good measure, Mr Jazeera
also threatened to arrest Iraqi drivers and
translators working for the press corps if we did
not comply. The 30-odd journalists staying at the
Sea Hotel decided to stay in Najaf.
Shortly after the deadline
expired, the first bullets struck the building.
But the sniper was almost certainly an Iraqi
policeman, given that the Mahdi army fighters
were more than two miles away.
Then armed police raided the
hotel and tried to arrest the journalists, before
imposing a new two-hour deadline to leave the
city. A deputation of
journalists was denied an audience with Najaf's
governor, Adnan al-Zurufi. The policeman outside
his office was brusque. "If you do not leave
by the deadline we will shoot you," he said.
That was enough for all but a
handful of British and American journalists who
hunkered down in the hotel as the deadline
expired. As night fell, shots
were fired at the roof of the hotel, from where
reporters file their stories.
Sadr's fighters are more
press-friendly. The cleric's aides frequently
drop into the hotel to brief journalists, or take
us to the shrine to meet Sadr or his spokesmen.
In Basra, Sadr's lieutenants
ordered the release of James Brandon, a reporter
taken hostage by Mahdi army renegades on Thursday
night.
It was not hard to see why
Iraq's interim government might prefer
journalists out of the city.
On Saturday, negotiations with
Mahdi army militants holed up in the Imam Ali
shrine broke down and a ceasefire was called off.
The options facing the US
marines and their Iraqi allies are grim. An
offensive on the shrine, burial place of Imam
Ali, cousin of the prophet Mohammed and
inspiration for Shia Islam, is likely to push
moderate Shias over to Sadr's side.
America would prefer the
fledgling Iraqi security services to carry out
the attack, but they are poorly equipped and
trained and unlikely to succeed.
Gunfire sounded in Najaf all
yesterday. By nightfall US tanks had moved to
within a few hundred yards of the shrine.
© Copyright 2004 by TruthOut.org
CAIRO, August 6
(IslamOnline.net) - The only effect the so-called
power transfer in Iraq has had on the situation
in Iraq was "Afghanizing" the media
coverage of the war-torn country, as the only
change on the ground was "for the
worse", according to a leading columnist in
a major US daily Friday, August 6.
"A funny thing
happened after the United States transferred
sovereignty over Iraq. On the ground, things
didn't change, except for the worse," Paul
Krugman, the opinion-editor of New York Times said.
"But as Matthew
Yglesias of The American Prospect puts
it, the cosmetic change in regime had the effect
of Afghanizing the media coverage of
Iraq," he added in an article under the
heading "What About Iraq?".
Krugman explained that
Yeglesias is referring to "the way news
coverage of Afghanistan dropped off sharply after
the initial military defeat of the Taliban".
"A nation we had
gone to war to liberate and had promised to
secure and rebuild - a promise largely broken -
once again became a small, faraway country of
which we knew nothing," he said about
Afghanistan.
Coverage
Krugman states how the
same twist took place as far as Iraq was
concerned after the handover of power.
"Incredibly, the
same thing happened to Iraq after June 28. Iraq
stories moved to the inside pages of newspapers,
and largely off TV screens. Many people got the
impression that things had improved.
"Even journalists
were taken in: a number of newspaper stories
asserted that the rate of US losses there fell
after the handoff. (Actual figures: 42 American
soldiers died in June, and 54 in July.),"
said the prominent columnist.
The trouble with this
shift of attention, he opined, is that if people
don't have a clear picture of what's actually
happening in Iraq, they won't be able to open a
serious discussion of the options that remain for
making the best of a very bad situation.
The military reality in
Iraq is that there has been no letup in attacks
against occupation forces, and large parts of the
country seem to be effectively under the control
of groups hostile to the US-backed government,
according to Krugman.
More than 15 US soldiers
were wounded in a fresh
flare-up of clashes with Sadrs Mahdi
Army militia in Iraq Friday, in which more than
50 people were killed in the midst of no security
and a Us chopper was shot down.
"And everywhere, of
course, the mortar attacks, bombings, kidnappings
and assassinations go on."
Lack Of Services
The US columnist also
noted that earlier promises made by Washington to
Iraqis seeking better life standards and safety
before the invasion of the oil-rich country have
not materialized.
"This summer, like
last summer, there are severe shortages of
electricity. Sewage is tainting the water supply,
and typhoid and hepatitis are on the rise.
"Unemployment
remains sky-high. Needless to say, all this
undermines any chance for the new Iraqi
government to gain wide support."
Krugman dismissed his
point in describing all this bad news is not to
be defeatist, but rather to set some realistic
context for the political debate.
He said calls for
American forces to "stay the course"
are fatuous, as "the course we're on leads
downhill".
"American soldiers
keep winning battles, but we're losing the war:
our military is under severe strain; we're
creating more terrorists than we're killing; our
reputation, including our moral authority, is
damaged each month this goes on," read the
article of the opinion editor of the American
daily.
End Occupation
The famous American
columnist called on the US forces to end their
position as an occupying power.
"We need to move
quickly to end our position as an occupying power
in a bitterly hostile land, the fate that none
other than former President George H. W. Bush
correctly warned could be the result of an
invasion of Iraq," he said.
"And that means
turning real power over to Iraqis.
"Again and again
since the early months after the fall of Baghdad
- when Paul Bremer III canceled local elections
in order to keep the seats warm for our favorite
exiles - US officials have passed up the chance
to promote credible Iraqi leaders. And each time
the remaining choices get worse."
Krugman added: "Yet
we're still doing it. Ayad Allawi is, probably,
something of a thug. Still, it's in our interests
that he succeed.
"But when Allawi
proposed an amnesty for "insurgents" -
a move that was obviously calculated to show that
he wasn't an American puppet - American
officials, probably concerned about how it would
look at home, stepped in to insist that
"insurgents" who have killed Americans
be excluded.
Inevitably, Krugman sees
this suggestion that American lives matter more
than Iraqi lives led to an unraveling of the
whole thing.
Allawi, had earlier
admitted that he had run an organization that
carried out a bombing campaign, in collaboration
with the CIA , in Iraq in the 1990s to topple
then President Saddam Hussein, "now looks
like a puppet."
"But we should get
realistic, and look in earnest for an exit,"
the American writer concluded.
On May 26, The New
York Times admitted in an unusual mea culpa
published substantial problems with its coverage
of Iraqs alleged weapons of mass
destruction and links to terrorism, saying it was
misled by Iraqi exiles and American intelligence.
The Times
published a number of articles backing claims
that Iraq possessed WMDs - none of which has been
found more than one year after the U.S.-led
occupation of the oil-rich country.