Zack de la Rocha talks to Ann Powers03:30 PM PT, Aug 11 2008 These days, the rock scene is low on mysterious figures. As the music has lost its countercultural edge, many of its champions have transformed into average celebrities, happy to speak into any microphone that wanders by. Thats not true of Zack de la Rocha: the Rage Against the Machine vocalist is the rare rock star who keeps his distance from the hype. De la Rocha is as famous for his radical politics as for incendiary poetics. Between his retirement from Rage in 2000 and his recent reunion with the band, hes limited his public appearances to the occasional rally or benefit show. His musical output has been spare too: only a few songs have seen light. But this summer, the 38-year-old Southland native is back and seemingly unstoppable. He has a new musical project -- One Day as a Lion, which pairs him with drummer Jon Theodore. One Day as a Lions self-titled debut EP, on Anti- Records, hit No. 28 on the Billboard charts with minimal media attention, and is gaining traction nationally on rock radio. A full release will come in the fall. De la Rocha has also found a way to embrace Rage again.
A 2007 Coachella appearance marked the bands return
as a live unit, and its shows have become major events.
Earlier this month, Rage blazed through a chaos-inspiring
set at Lollapalooza in Chicago, and the band has just
announced a Sept. 3 Minneapolis date, which will serve as
a protest against the Republican National Convention
occurring simultaneously in St. Paul. How did One Day as a Lion,
your new project with drummer Jon Theodore, come about? Ive
known Jon for several years now, and I saw some of his
first performances as a member of the Mars Volta. He come
from Baltimore and had been in some underground bands
there, so Id heard of him. When I did see him it
was clear that music in L.A. was never going be the same
now that he was here! Ive worked with some great
drummers, and have seen people try to execute those kinds
of things before, but never as effortlessly and with as
much feel. He exists in this realm between John Bonham
and Elvin Jones. I havent seen drumming like that
in a long time. The EP came out without much warning and basically no hype. What was the strategy involved in releasing it that way? I wish I could say there was a strategy involved! We
felt that the collection of songs we had chosen had
resonated with us and it was really something we wanted
people to discover on their own. Thats been missing
from music, in a way; weve been marketed to so much,
rather than people discovering something and picking it
up. How did the signing with Anti- come about? Ive known Brett [Gurewitz, Bad Religion guitarist and the labels founder] for years and weve collaborated on a few things in the past, and I appreciate his perspective on making music. He has a genuine respect for artists. I think Anti- can bring in a number of voices that wouldnt be considered in our rigid radio format-dominated industry still. I found that appealing. And its kind of in the neighborhood. But they also have the ability to enable us to grow if that ends up happening. We are working on another album now. And we want to play shows and be a band and go out and start some noise. The bands name, One Day as a Lion, hints that this might not be a long-lived project. Am I reading that right? No! This is not simply a burst of energy. We are going
to be making records and writing songs. Were still
in the process of forming as a band -- we need a keyboard
player, Im not good enough to do it all myself --
so that will be rectified soon.
Why is there no guitar in these new songs? Ive always wanted to experiment with sounds that could provide a kind of tension, something you cant avoid. When I first heard the sirens and high sax squeals of hip hop in the late 80s, I was drawn to creating those textures. With this new music, its wasnt a choice not to use guitars so much as the spontaneity of that moment when Jon and I got together, regardless of the instrumentation. We wanted to produce a sound that was much larger than what youd think it could be. Youve worked with many collaborators since leaving Rage, including Trent Reznor and DJ Shadow. Did what you learned from those experiments factor into ODAAL? To an extent it did, and it didnt. When I left Rage first off, I was very heartbroken, and secondly, I became obsessed with completely reinventing my wheel. In an unhealthy way, to a degree. I kind of forgot that old way of allowing yourself to just be a conduit. When I was working with Trent and Shadow, I felt that I was going through the motions. Not that what was produced wasnt great, but I feel now that Ive maybe reinvented the base sounds that emanate from the songs. But Im still doing what I feel I do well, while looking for a more minimal sound. The first ODAAL single is called Wild
International. That implies a global politics from
the get go. How does your work fit into that scenario? Before we get into the larger thing, that song is a
response to the way we saw the U.S. government try to
reframe the conflicts of the world. Particularly when the
Soviet Union had collapsed, there was no way to subject
the country to the kind of fear needed to justify what I
consider to be an ill distribution of wealth. After 9/11
you could see that reframing taking place. The specter of
Communism no longer haunted the U.S., justifying its
actions in Latin America and all over the world. What
filled that void were Al Qaeda and the Muslim world in
general. That song is, in an abstract way, addressing the
way the right has distracted people from this huge rush
of wealth from the bottom to the top. On the surface, some of these new songs seem very anti-religious, including the single. I dont see it as an anti-religious song. I see it as the West has been using Christianity as a way to justify its actions when in reality, those figures, Christ and Muhammad, were rebels. These two religious figures have been co-opted to justify power, although they fought against the abuses of power and the expansion of empire. Its almost like, what would Christ and Muhammad do? What do you think of the state of political art now? Sometimes it seems to have really died down, what with a mainstream full of teen pop and reality television. Im listening to things all the time. There have
been eight years of the Bush administration and the
decline of real wages, and people are responding all the
time. Its unfortunate that more conscious artists
or political artists in general havent been heard
in the mainstream. But I think back to when I was going
to hardcore shows and I saw the Bad Brains, those moments
resonate and are life-altering moments. Those people who
were at those shows have become artists or activists as a
result of having their perspective shifted. During the
1980s when punk was seen as unviable or dangerous, or
threatening to the music industry, those voices went
underground and created their own networks and vehicles
for producing what they produced. It did create a very
politicized generation. So I dont necessarily feel
that music within the mainstream is always an indication
of the political frustrations that exist beneath the
surface. One line jumped out at me, from the title track -- If L.A. were Baghdad, wed be Iraqi. In one sense, that line about one of those redemptive
moments that run through the whole EP. But Im also
making a comparison between the expansion of U.S. power
into Iraq and Afghanistan and the history of the
Southwest, which has been erased. Theres a very
close relationship between what happened in Fallujah and
what happened at the Alamo. How do those two elements of your own life -- activism and music-making -- intersect or diverge now? I dont think the separation is valid, especially
in these times. For me, the only time that that line gets
drawn when youre producing music and youre
trying to flush out a certain idea -- thats very
liberating, in a very abstract way. Its in those
moments where you feel free, and you can go ahead and
explore why you feel free in those moments. In the past
moments with Shadow and Trent I didnt feel that. Its an election year here in the U.S. -- did that factor in to your decision to debut new music now? Id be lying if I said it was coincidental. I
think that its an interesting moment. The lowest
approval rating in the history of any presidency -- and
for Congress. Theres this interesting rupture
developing, and I think its a healthy one. Youve been touring with Rage again. What is your relationship like with those guys now? So much has changed. When you get older, you look back on tensions and grievances and have another perspective on it. I think our relationship now is better than its ever been. I would even describe it as great. Were going to keep playing shows -- we have a couple of big ones happening in front of both conventions. As far as us recording music in the future, I dont know where we all fit with that. Weve all embraced each others projects and support them, and thats great. When you look out a crowd like the one you
played in front of at Lollapalooza, what kind of
potential do you see there? There was this interesting thing that happened during the Clinton administration; people were looking inward and not outward, and not addressing what was going on. Rage set the political foreground for things that would come very shortly thereafter. I think people might see that what we are saying has more relevance now than when the band first came out. Can we look forward to some live ODAAL gigs in the near future? Definitely. Ive always hoped that a project I was involved in could be a little more spontaneous, set up on a block and play. Me and Jon see eye to eye on doing that. Meanwhile, as you said, Rage is playing in
Minneapolis the same night the Youre gonna have to come and cover it. I think we both know what we expect. Good shoes would help. And you might wanna dip that bandanna in some vinegar. Top photo courtesy of Anti-; second photo of De la Rocha playing in Scotland by Ed Jones/AFP/Getty Images
|